The question comes without warning. Usually in the evening, usually around five or six, usually right when you were rushing to finish something else:
"Mummy, what was I like when I was little?"
And then there's a short pause in which you realise, slightly panicked, that you don't have a good answer. You say something like "you were so adorable", "you were such an easy baby", "you ate everything". Your child accepts it, because they're small. But you're left with the odd feeling that you just missed something.
You did. And it's worth understanding why.
What they're really asking
Around five or six, children start to grasp something unsettling: they existed before their own memories begin. There are photographs of a child everyone insists is them, and they remember nothing at all. That period is a hole in their own story.
So they ask. And the question isn't simple curiosity — it's something deeper: "who was I, before I could remember?" And underneath it, a check that every child performs without knowing: "was I wanted? Were you happy that I came?"
That's why the answer matters far more than it seems on an ordinary evening.
Why "you were adorable" isn't enough
Not because it's untrue, but because it says nothing about them. All babies are adorable. It's the answer any child would get, from any parent.
Compare it with:
The second answer does something different: it gives the child a detail that belongs only to them. It isn't a generic baby description, it's proof that they were watched closely, as a specific person, from the very beginning.
"Children aren't asking what they looked like. They're asking who they were."
A photo album answers the first question. Very few families have an answer to the second.
Why parents end up with no answer
Here's the unfair part: it's nobody's fault. The details children ask about are exactly the ones an adult memory loses first:
- They're small — an invented word, an odd habit, a funny reaction. The brain doesn't flag them as important.
- They happen during the period that gets recorded worst: the early years, with fragmented sleep and identical days. (We covered the mechanism at length in "I thought I'd remember".)
- They go untold. What you don't repeat fades — and you never repeated these to anyone, because they seemed too minor.
The result: five years after the event, you have ten thousand photos and three anecdotes. Fifteen years on, you have ten thousand photos and the same three anecdotes, increasingly polished by retelling.
How to build a true answer
1. Recover what you still can, now
If your child is already 6, it isn't too late — but it's later than yesterday. Do one single hour-long session:
- Open your gallery from ages 0–3 and scroll slowly. Photos work as a trigger for memories you can't reach "on demand".
- Write down everything that comes back, however small. Especially the small things.
- Ask the other parent. You'll find you remember completely different things.
- Ask the grandparents. They weren't exhausted, and they noticed details you missed.
- Search your old conversations. The messages you sent back then are an involuntary journal, written in real time.
2. Stop the loss, from today
One sentence a week, concrete, about who your child is right now. Not "we had a good day", but what they said, what they invented, what made them laugh. One minute. Ten years from now, those sentences are exactly the answer to the question we're discussing.
3. Write the answer down properly, once
The best thing you can do: turn the answer into a letter. Not one to open tomorrow — one for later, when the question comes back in a deeper form: "who am I, really, and where do I come from?"
Because the question asked at 5 doesn't go away. It transforms. At 18, at 25, on their first day as a parent, they'll want to know again how it all started. The difference is that by then they won't be able to ask so easily — and you'll remember even less.
Nestori keeps the sentences, the voices and the letters that make up the answer to "what was I like when I was little?" — chronologically, per child, sealed until the age you choose.
Write the first letterFree, no card. Encrypted, stored in the EU, export anytime.
What not to do
- Don't invent. It's tempting to fill the gap with plausible detail. But children sense the difference between a lived story and a constructed one, and a short real anecdote beats ten minutes of improvisation.
- Don't turn it back to yourself. "Oh, it was so hard, I never slept" is your answer to a different question. They're asking about them.
- Don't apologise. If you don't remember, just say: "I don't remember much from that time, but let's ask Grandma — and let's start writing things down so we don't forget from now on." You've turned a gap into a shared project.
The lovely part
One thing is worth saying at the end: retelling genuinely works. Stories told often become fixed — and a child who hears about their earliest years ends up feeling they have them, even without being able to access them directly. You're not just giving them information, you're giving them a beginning.
Which is why the question at five is really a gift in disguise: it's the moment your child tells you, without knowing it, what they'll want in eighteen years. Few parents get a brief that clear.
And the answer to it isn't written in one evening. It's collected, one sentence a week, starting today.